Message-ID:	<3E68E3E7.AEEDAA3C@yahoo.com>
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Compiling GRX 245
References:	<002101c2e3fc$181e0700$0300a8c0 AT rivasaiicfa DOT com DOT ar> <b47tt5$ep5$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <3E67AEC5 DOT 9AF3CA27 AT yahoo DOT com> <200303062110 DOT h26LAJD32316 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3E6879B8 DOT 92765D5A AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Lines:	26
Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2003 18:44:41 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	12.90.169.71
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace:	bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1047062681 12.90.169.71 (Fri, 07 Mar 2003 18:44:41 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2003 18:44:41 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
> >
> > > Out of perverse curiosity I did just that, and found nothing in
> > > any of the read*.* files that mentioned va_list.
> >
> > Perhaps it's covered by this phrase in readme.DJGPP:
> >
> >   DJGPP-2.03 and above (Please verify that You really have current
> >          update of djdev203.zip if You use 2.03).
> >
> > IIRC we fixed the header file in the 2.03 update.
> 
> Yes, it was fixed in DJGPP 2.03 refresh 2.

You know that, I suspected it, but how did anyone expect the
readmes (which don't mention va_list) to clue the OP (who
mentioned va_list) in?

Maybe a release should contain some sort of summary of bugs fixed.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!

- Raw text -