Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E1813E5.F8D828C0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:15:49 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJGPP newsgroup <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>, "Mark E." <snowball3 AT softhome DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Handling of TMPDIR, TEMP by various DJGPP programs
References:	<3E14606E DOT E5B4D1A9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7458-Thu02Jan2003202306+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <1041532689 DOT 964798 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3E14D4D7 DOT 7847EB0C AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Richard Dawe wrote:
[snip]
> One thing I noticed is that bash 2.04 does not set $SHELL. If I set $SHELL
> to point at the bash 2.04 executable, it does not affect the results. bash
> 2.05 does set $SHELL.
[snip]

Hmmm. This isn't entirely true. If I invoke bash 2.05b from bash 2.04, then
bash 2.05b doesn't set $SHELL to point to itself. It seems that bash 2.04 sets
$SHELL to point to COMMAND.COM and then bash 2.05b keeps the setting. If I
invoke bash 2.05b from an MS-DOS prompt, then it does set $SHELL to the full
path of the bash 2.05b executable.

Regards,

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -