From:	"ChaoTix" <ChaoTix AT c-a-t DOT nl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: TSR Programs (Desperate)
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:21:11 +0200
Organization:	XS4ALL Internet BV
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<aoocou$b5b$1@news1.xs4all.nl>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1021017162423 DOT 10309B AT is> <aomjeg$8h8$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <aommqo$ecg$1 AT news1 DOT xs4all DOT nl> <aon0ad$2e5$1 AT pippin DOT warman DOT nask DOT pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	213-84-241-227.adsl.xs4all.nl
X-Trace:	news1.xs4all.nl 1034925662 11435 213.84.241.227 (18 Oct 2002 07:21:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT xs4all DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	18 Oct 2002 07:21:02 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Because I use them so them to multitask with a kernel. This means they will
be very large in memmory, and will be putted in convertional memmory. After
about 4 programs, the system will crach. Thats why I need DPMI to make some
things better.

Stilll nobody that can help me with this one?

"Wojciech Galazka" <wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl> wrote in message
news:aon0ad$2e5$1 AT pippin DOT warman DOT nask DOT pl...

Well, why don't you write a real mode TSR ?
I do not see any benefits of a TSR being a DPMI program, only troubles ...

- Raw text -