Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:54:51 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Neil Gower <neilg AT inago DOT com>
Message-Id:	<9743-Thu27Jun2002095451+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3D1A2D1F.9050308@inago.com> (message from Neil Gower on Wed, 26
	Jun 2002 17:07:43 -0400)
Subject:	Re: using configure with VC6?
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020626080011 DOT 9266C-100000 AT is> <3D1A2D1F DOT 9050308 AT inago DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Neil Gower <neilg AT inago DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:07:43 -0400
> 
> I did a quick test, and the cl output is consistent with a successful 
> build, except that it would generate conftest.exe, not conftest.  So I 
> hacked up the configure script and set ac_exeext=.exe (is there a proper 
> way to do this?).

It's a bug in the configure script.  Latest Autoconf produces
configure scripts which know about .exe.

> At that point, configure just stopped, apparently locked up.  Couldn't 
> ^C or anything.  When I re-ran configure, it miraculously completed, 
> though there were several errors surrounding creating and deleting the 
> conftest directory (which was left over from the locked up run).  I ran 
> it one more time, and configure seemed to run cleanly.  Does that mean 
> everything should be good to build?

There's some problem, but if you succeeded to run the script cleanly,
the files it produces should be okay.

- Raw text -