From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: enum
Date:	21 May 2002 00:53:07 GMT
Organization:	Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<acc5pj$l1s$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References:	<20020520160611 DOT 9371 DOT qmail AT web11307 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace:	nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1021942387 21564 137.226.32.75 (21 May 2002 00:53:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	21 May 2002 00:53:07 GMT
Originator:	broeker@
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Pedro Izecksohn <izecksohn AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:

>    Because according to ANSI, in the code: "enum name {
> a,b,c,d } varname;", what is the purpose of "name" if to
> "a" is being attribed a value that is valid in all the file
> ?

Its purpose is so you can define a variable of type "enum name".  In
suitable compilers, this will allow for more detailed checking of your
code.  For example, let's assume code like this:

enum name { a, b, c, d, e, f};
...
enum name Name;
...

switch(Name) {
  case a:
    /*... */
  case b:
    /* ,... */
}

Compiling this in GCC with warnings turned on will give you a warning
that cases c, d, e and f are not handled in this switch.  You'll also
get a warning if you assign a (compile-time constant) value to
variable "Name" that doesn't correspond to any of the enumerated ones.

Such warnings are not mandatory, i.e. they're not part of the language
definitions.
-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -