Mail Archives: djgpp/2002/03/22/07:18:02
Dr Green <drgreen27_no AT spam_hotmail DOT com> wrote in
news:feml9ug2juptiks5k4ectltvfret4jed37 AT 4ax DOT com:
> On 19 Mar 2002 04:20:37 GMT, "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu> wrote:
>
>>
>>i know i didn't say much that is useful. here is my best attempt at
>>getting something that at least compiles with djgpp.
>>
>
> I forgot to ask this. You mentioned that you got it to compile with
> djgpp. That means (unless i didn't post all the relavent code), that
> the functions that i have no clue about may be in a library included
> with djgpp. Could you tell me the settings/makefile/arguments you
> used to compile this. Of course, now that i think about it... you may
> not have linked it, so maybe the libraries aren't there. But, if it
> compiled, then the headers were there for the definition of the low
> level functions in question.
The version that I got to compile was included at the end of my message.
I just did a gcc -Wall -c file.c. It compiled with one warning about
tbuff being unused in dbpoke. Of course, the fact that it compiled does
not mean much, other than to give you a starting point.
inportb etc are declared in pc.h.
hope this helps.
Sinan.
- Raw text -