Sender:	tim AT riker DOT skynet DOT be
Message-ID:	<3B38A4B1.67C2F96F@falconsoft.be>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:05:21 +0200
From:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
Organization:	Anubex N.V.
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-win4lin i686)
X-Accept-Language:	en, nl-BE, nl
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
CC:	jbailey8 AT triad DOT rr DOT com, eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Subject:	Re: more info
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 20010625223038 DOT 007c4480 AT pop-server DOT triad DOT rr DOT com> <3B382573 DOT 4F9FDE25 AT falconsoft DOT be> <7458-Tue26Jun2001173651+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:02:27 +0200
> > From: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
> >
> > jonathan bailey wrote:
> >
> > > However, this did not correct the xgcc ./specs file problem, I still get
> > > the 'permission denied' error. What else could cause this?
> >
> > I don't have a clue.
> 
> Could it be that `xgcc' is a directory?
I doubt it:

./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/djgpp/bin/ -isystem /usr/local/djgpp/include -S
tmp-dum.c
xgcc.exe: ./specs: Permission denied (EACCES)

So it's clearly an error reported by xgcc.exe.  Assuming specs isn't
readonly
(or hidden or system), there's probably not many possible reasons.
If xgcc is trying to create ./specs through renaming and it's on WinME,
it might
be a rename() issue; other than that, I'd consider the possibility of
xgcc trying
to run ./specs most likely.

-- 
Tim Van Holder - Anubex N.V.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message was posted using plain text. I do not endorse any
products or services that may be hyperlinked to this message.

- Raw text -