Sender:	tim AT riker DOT skynet DOT be
Message-ID:	<3B382573.4F9FDE25@falconsoft.be>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:02:27 +0200
From:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
Organization:	Anubex N.V.
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-win4lin i686)
X-Accept-Language:	en, nl-BE, nl
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	jonathan bailey <jbailey8 AT triad DOT rr DOT com>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: more info
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 20010625223038 DOT 007c4480 AT pop-server DOT triad DOT rr DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

jonathan bailey wrote:
> 
> Hello Tim,
> I re-ran configure and made new makefiles with the proper prefix this
> time (u:/djgppv2/) <- dir of currently installed gcc version 2.95.2.

I would strongly recommend configuring with /dev/env/DJDIR as prefix
though;
that way, you can move the DJGPP tree without having to rebuild gcc.

> However, this did not correct the xgcc ./specs file problem, I still get
> the 'permission denied' error. What else could cause this?

I don't have a clue.  You could try locating the exact command being run
in
the Makefile, and adding a -v to the list of options and seeing what
that
prints.
One cause would be that gcc is trying to run
  $blah ./specs
where $blah is the name of some program as determined by configure; but
if
$blah was somehow determined to be empty, that means gcc would try to
run
"./specs" instead, which would likely cause the 'Access Denied' error.

And please, reply to the list instead of to me directly.

-- 
Tim Van Holder - Anubex N.V.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message was posted using plain text. I do not endorse any
products or services that may be hyperlinked to this message.

- Raw text -