From:	invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Graaagh the Mighty)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Peculiar behavior of program.
Organization:	Low Charisma Anonymous
Message-ID:	<3b372379.238124895@news.primus.ca>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010624105542 DOT 13700J AT is>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
Lines:	17
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:42:56 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	207.176.153.32
X-Complaints-To:	news AT primus DOT ca
X-Trace:	news2.tor.primus.ca 993470398 207.176.153.32 (Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:59:58 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:59:58 EDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:56:05 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii
<eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> sat on a tribble, which squeaked:

>Note that CWSDPMI didn't crash: it is CWSDPMI that printed this
>message.  Then it exited.

Well, why is there no traceback for the user code then? Normally when
the host detects an access violation in user code, it prints a
traceback, e.g. the segfault I posted in another thread, as well as
terminating the user code. Earlier you said there was no traceback
because the host was dying horribly and not merely the user code.

-- 
Bill Gates: "No computer will ever need more than 640K of RAM." -- 1980
"There's nobody getting rich writing software that I know of." -- 1980
"This antitrust thing will blow over." -- 1998
Combine neo, an underscore, and one thousand sixty-one to make my hotmail addy.

- Raw text -