Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/06/23/19:00:25.3
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:29:33 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii
<eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> sat on a tribble, which squeaked:
>
>On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:58:54 GMT, invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Graaagh the
>Mighty) sat on a tribble, which squeaked:
>
>>I have more information. On a hunch I looked at the changes. There was
>>a bug in one of the debugging bits I added that would in fact have
>>jumped into never-never land -- *if* "bar" had ever been reached. So
>>why weren't the call frame traceback EIPs more like:
>>
>> 0x01fc0000 0x1fc0000
>> 0x00f00ba7 _bar+42, line 666 of bwlsm.c
>> 0x0000178b _main+275, line 195 of bwlsm.c
>> 0x00057b7a ___crt1_startup+174
>>
>>even with no aggressive optimizations?
>
>Because the crash happened inside CWSDPMI, and CWSDPMI doesn't have
>access to your program's call stack.
Wrong thread. This was a different problem, and as you can see from
reading the post, I *did* get a traceback, it merely seemed to omit
information. Also, that one was dealt with entirely under Windoze.
CWSDPMI was never even invoked.
--
Bill Gates: "No computer will ever need more than 640K of RAM." -- 1980
"There's nobody getting rich writing software that I know of." -- 1980
"This antitrust thing will blow over." -- 1998
Combine neo, an underscore, and one thousand sixty-one to make my hotmail addy.
- Raw text -