Date:	Fri, 08 Jun 2001 14:37:42 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Orlando P. Hevia" <heviaop AT ssdfe DOT com DOT ar>
Message-Id:	<8296-Fri08Jun2001143742+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com, tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be
In-reply-to:	<200106081202.IAA27634@pop3.lc-2.la.inter.net>
	(heviaop AT ssdfe DOT com DOT ar)
Subject:	Re: Has ar a limit? II
References:	<200106081202 DOT IAA27634 AT pop3 DOT lc-2 DOT la DOT inter DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Orlando P. Hevia" <heviaop AT ssdfe DOT com DOT ar>
> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:01:20 -0300
> 
> I converted the block data to a subroutine with only the 
> data lines in it. I call this subroutine early in the main, 
> and all works OK.

Can you show the converted (C) source, or a fragment of it?

> The object was included in library and in is pulled in without
> problem.

The difference between libraries and object files is that object files
are always linked into the program, while if they are in a library,
they are only linked if the linker ``knows'' some code uses the
external symbols in that object file.

So the question is: does the converted code have external symbols
(except its own name) that other code references.  That's why I asked
to see the converted code.

- Raw text -