From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Which version?
Date:	31 May 2001 16:35:32 GMT
Organization:	Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<9f5rsk$ajs$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References:	<pguR6.332$jj DOT 2275 AT newsfeed DOT slurp DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace:	nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 991326932 10876 137.226.32.75 (31 May 2001 16:35:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	31 May 2001 16:35:32 GMT
Originator:	broeker@
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Brent Ritchie <azreal AT cyberbeach DOT net> wrote:
> Hello,
>         I have DJGPP v2.0 and was wondering if it was worth upgrading to
> v2.02. 

No --- you should upgrade straight to 2.03 :-)

> Seeming I have a slow connection. If it is worth upgrading What are
> the components I would have to change?

From 2.00 to 2.03: just about all of them. Almost all packages have
been updated since the days of 2.00, most of them for good reasons.

If you think you can't stand the download time: try getting yourself a
CD snapshot of Simtel.Net. Walnut Creek used to do those.

-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -