From:	Daniel Barker <sokal AT holyrood DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Penalty for immature language (PERL/BASH)
Date:	Sun, 4 Mar 2001 21:34:39 +0000
Organization:	Edinburgh University
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<Pine.SOL.4.21.0103042124120.24390-100000@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010304080956 DOT 12520D-100000 AT is> <Pine DOT SOL DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0103041457030 DOT 10320-100000 AT holyrood DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <2110-Sun04Mar2001181824+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	holyrood.ed.ac.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	scotsman.ed.ac.uk 983741673 15498 129.215.16.14 (4 Mar 2001 21:34:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT scotsman DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk
NNTP-Posting-Date:	4 Mar 2001 21:34:33 GMT
In-Reply-To:	<2110-Sun04Mar2001181824+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

[snip]

> The next version of the DJGPP library changes the way `system' handles
> such files, because the current behavior is a bit unsafe, as you
> learned from this example.  The modified `system' will not find
> `poo.pl' unless you actually mention the .pl extension.  But I imagine
> even the new code will crash if you say `poo.pl` in a Perl program,
> and `poo.pl' doesn't have the "#!/usr/local/perl" on its first line.

Thank you very much for the explanation of the problem. The behaviour of
the new system() sounds good. But if poo (without extension) were run from
PERL as `poo`, would the underlying call to system() still find poo.exe,
poo.com and whatever other programs one would expect to work without an
extension?

-- 
Daniel Barker.

- Raw text -