Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/03/04/15:36:45.1
Hm.. it seems to me you think rhide is good. I think I should keep it then.
"Alexei A. Frounze" wrote:
>RHIDE simplifies life greatly. But one should get a rid of all problems with
>it first. Like RHIDE creates some stuff in the temporary directory and
>doesn't delete it
Yea I've noticed that, and its pretty annoying too but that's not too big of a
concern. Just gotta remember to delete them
>As for Allegro, one must compile it first.
About allegro, what do you mean you have to compile it first? Do you mean I have
to download the allegro's source code and compile it manually?
Also, can you please show me the code you have in the batch files to get rid of
these problems? eg video and mouse problems.
I keep trying to fix the problems myself but its really frustrating. There are a
lot of errors I dont know what they mean. Sometimes it compiles the program, it
says there are no errors then it says it cannot link allegro. It says something
like this -1alleg
I checked the options/libraries and it has this for the first line:
alleg (and it is checked).
should it be "alleg" ? or maybe 'alleg' ? or is it fine?
Thanks for your help,
Paul M.
> RHIDE simplifies life greatly. But one should get a rid of all problems with
> it first. Like RHIDE creates some stuff in the temporary directory and
> doesn't delete it, has some problems with mouse and video modes. But there
> are simple ways to fix those problems manually (like batch files that delete
> RHIDE-produced junk, add a switch to set up mouse proper support, probably
> use 80x25 in a window and never let it expand or something (e.g. set up a
> PIF file)...
> Moreover, it's easy to debug programs in the IDE.
> As for Allegro, one must compile it first.
>
> Good Luck
> --
> Alexei A. Frounze
> alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
> http://alexfru.chat.ru
> http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/
> http://welcome.to/pmode/
- Raw text -