delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Fri, 02 Mar 2001 14:00:46 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | "Mr. Veli Suorsa" <VJSuorsa AT Surfeu DOT Fi>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <6480-Fri02Mar2001140046+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 |
CC: | rprash AT wilco-int DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <3a9f821b.7829.0@surfeu.fi> (VJSuorsa@Surfeu.Fi) |
Subject: | Re: Fortran / C compiler precision and code pack |
References: | <3a9f821b DOT 7829 DOT 0 AT surfeu DOT fi> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: "Mr. Veli Suorsa" <VJSuorsa AT Surfeu DOT Fi> > > > >| Another thing, that bothers me is size of exe- code (about 150 KB > >| and when pkzipped > >| about 50 KB). Is there any way or switch to pack/ optimise code? > > > >You probably forgot to strip it. Use > > > >strip filename.exe > > > >and see the difference. > > I try this strip ( how large bra ;-) and result was about 100 KB exe > code. Have you any better one? What's wrong with 100KB? Fortran has a large and complex formatted I/O facility, and you pay for that with the executable size. The bloat is additive, so large real-life programs still get several tens of KBytes added. What is the problem with that, exactly? How large did you expect the program to be on disk? > >It doesn't IIRC. > > What does this IIRC mean (I know only IRC)? IIRC is If I remember Correctly. > Who has put a finger to a wrong place? I cannot parse this sentence. > I need these other compilers to testing and converting code to C/ C++. I pointed you to the DJGPP port of the GNU Pascal compiler the other day. Is something wrong with that?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |