From:	"Doug" <deleveld AT dds DOT nl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Anyone have VGA (620x480x4) code to share
Date:	2 Mar 2001 00:37:34 GMT
Organization:	none
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<01c0a2b2$6c3588a0$8a247d81@doug>
References:	<01c0a1c5$da8125a0$98247d81 AT doug> <97lgjj$4s0$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	client36-138.oprit.rug.nl
X-Trace:	info.service.rug.nl 983493454 6341 129.125.36.138 (2 Mar 2001 00:37:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	newsmaster AT rug DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	2 Mar 2001 00:37:34 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> schreef in artikel 
> simple 256 color modes where you can usually just write a single byte
> to a particular memory location and be done with it. Esp. since VESA
> linear frame buffering is available for just about every piece of
> hardware currently in use.

I want it for my Depui library so that I can have a driver even for very
old VGA
hardware.  I've got a book on this mode but, as you said, it is complicated
and
I'm not at all sure that I can do it my self.  I can probably find some
code for old 
Borland C++ 3.11 compiler, but I'm not confidant that I could get it
working with 
DJGPP.
 
> I.e. unless there's a very good reason in favour of doing it, keep
> your fingers off those modes. Use 640x480x256 or something higher,
> instead, or if you really must, rely on BIOS putpixel routines to
> access them. The fraction of machines that offer 640x480x16 but not
> 640x480x256 is small enough to be negligible for just about every
> application.

Normally, I'd aggree with you here, but I really want my gui to be _very_ 
portable, and want to supprot the absolute basics, even old 386's.

Does no one use this mode at all?

Doug

- Raw text -