Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:14:07 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Message-Id:	<8296-Fri16Feb2001221407+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<96j0vj$dfb$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> (message from
	Hans-Bernhard Broeker on 16 Feb 2001 10:55:47 GMT)
Subject:	Re: [malfer AT teleline DOT es: Announce GRX 2.3.4]
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010215161508 DOT 29378B-100000 AT is> <96gvlr$2h9$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <96j0vj$dfb$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 16 Feb 2001 10:55:47 GMT
> 
> I now believe that the problems I thought I remembered were actually
> the other way round: *Linux* GCC used to have all kinds of problems
> with DOS sources brought back to the Linux platform.

Yes, this is known (and the reason why I prefer to leave the files in
Unix format: some people cross-compile DJGPP binaries on Unix).

Latest versions of GCC do cope with DOS-style EOLs, btw.

- Raw text -