From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:26:23 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: [malfer AT teleline DOT es: Announce GRX 2.3.4]
Message-ID:	<3A8BE70F.10008.8D694A@localhost>
References:	<3A8B00F4 DOT 83A33473 AT teleline DOT es>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010215131153.27892I-100000@is>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 15 Feb 2001, at 13:12, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mariano Alvarez Fernandez wrote:
> 
> > > There is no need to prepare special CR/LF files for DJGPP, is there?
> > 
> > I think is the correct thing to do.
> > 
> > Most (if not all) DJGPP packages don't worry about the text file format,
> > but most DOS/Windows programs (where DJGPP live) have problems.
> > 
> > Nevertheless I can upload again the package without CRLF if people want
> > it, DJ?, Eli?
> 
> IMHO, the only file that might be a good idea to have in DOS CRLF
> format is the DJGPP-specific README.  It is the only file that a naive
> user should be able to read with the most basic (read: stock DOS)
> tools, such as the TYPE command.
> 

In all latest archives of DJGPP port of gcc-2.95.X I only  .BAT files 
(there is only one in gcc295Xs.zip) were in CR LF format.
All other files (including DJGPP related readme files) were in Unix text 
format. I didn't saw any objections about this. There are not so much 
programs which are not able to display such files (like Notapad.exe)

Andris

PS. Perhaps I should have changed this if somebody objected ...

- Raw text -