Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/02/07/14:32:57
Tom St Denis wrote:
> In article <3A817101 DOT 3106B5A9 AT gmx DOT de>,
> SilverBanana AT gmx DOT de wrote:
> > I'd like to ask if there is somewhere an newer experimental version of
> > DJGPP like 2.96 or 2.97. If so where can it be found?
> If you peek at the CVS trees you can get the latest, why did you find a
> problem with 2.95.2?
http://www.codesourcery.com/gcc-compile.shtml offers an interface to a
brand new version of GCC. It compiled this source without trouble:
template <class TTempClass1, TTempClass1 m1>
template <class TTempClass2>
void func2(TClass1<TTempClass2, 3> c1)
Gcc 2.95.2 keeps telling me that templates in paramters (or something
like that) is not yet implemented. Gcc 2.97 seems to have this feature.
- Raw text -