Sender:	salvador AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A6F2085.A6B3159@inti.gov.ar>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:35:49 -0300
From:	salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: compiler efficiency
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0101172014390 DOT 7634-100000 AT sandman DOT ucdavis DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Mike Darrett wrote:

> Any ideas? Is Borland C++ using thunking to access memory? Is DJGPP simply
> more efficient? Would like to get any input before I try optimizing the
> code any further.

BC++ is in the group of the "worst" compilers. Look for MSVC and Intel to
find a rival for gcc.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013

- Raw text -