Message-ID:	<3A57BFC6.19911988@bigpond.com>
From:	Ben Harris <ben DOT harris AT bigpond DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: #include <limits>
References:	<3A570B97 DOT F3FBA15B AT bigpond DOT com> <9379a7$dv4$1 AT newsg2 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk>
Lines:	27
Date:	Sun, 07 Jan 2001 12:00:54 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Host:	203.54.65.243
X-Trace:	newsfeeds.bigpond.com 978828380 203.54.65.243 (Sun, 07 Jan 2001 11:46:20 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 07 Jan 2001 11:46:20 EST
Organization:	Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Stephen, thanks for the reply.
Are you aware of any other ICO C++ headers that DJGPP (or its associated
C++ compiler add-on) is missing?

Ben.

Stephen Silver wrote:
> 
> Ben Harris wrote:
> 
> > Hi guys, I'm just wondering if it is a coincidence that my DJGPP package
> > didn't come with a <limits> header or if it's me...
> 
> DJGPP doesn't have a <limits> header.  I wrote one for my own use which
> I've just uploaded to http://www.argentum.freeserve.co.uk/cpp/limits in
> case anyone wants a copy.  I've tested this on MinGW as well as DJGPP.
> It's not quite complete, as I haven't implemented some of the member
> functions of the floating point specializations (because they are of no
> interest to me, and it wasn't immediately obvious to me how they should
> be defined).  I haven't used this header very extensively, so there may
> be other problems which I haven't noticed.
> 
> Even recent development snapshots of libstdc++ don't implement <limits>.
> This is not really surprising, as it's platform dependent and so best
> left to those who maintain GCC ports.
> 
> Stephen

- Raw text -