delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:02:25 -0700 |
From: | Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: bash 2.04 |
Message-ID: | <20010106140225.A17172@taniwha.org> |
Mail-Followup-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <Xns9020DCBDF386sxmydejacom AT 130 DOT 133 DOT 1 DOT 4> <9743-Sat06Jan2001123641+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Mutt 1.0.1i |
In-Reply-To: | <9743-Sat06Jan2001123641+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:36:42PM +0200 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:36:42PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The library (and thus Bash) does make exception for the DOS standard > extensions .exe, .com, .bat, and .btm, but only because the stock > shells behave like that. Hmm, I'm out of touch. What's .btm? Bill -- Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |