Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/01/04/18:06:53
okay, here we go:
si - no
b1anc0 - negr0
g0d - h***
...
Why the h*** "h***" is filtered out but g0d is n0t? Isn't this a
discrimination after all? why g0d is better and less offensive than h***? is
there a proof? Btw, if we have a word which assumes existance of the
opposite meaning, we can suppress use of either of these words.
Anyway everybody knows this word, everybody knows this form of question
[this word was actually used in the question like above^^^^], everybody
knows that this question is less offensive than an insult with out any of
such questions and words at all.
You know, when a parent doesn't buy to his/her child an expensive toy it can
be treatead (from child's point of view) as an insult and can be carried out
without much saying about it. :)
Come on, there is no offence or insult at all. My words are not actions of
violence. Anyone objects? :)
--
Alexei A. Frounze
alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
frounze [AT] ece [DOT] rochester [DOT] edu
http://alexfru.chat.ru
http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/
http://welcome.to/pmode/
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote in message
news:2561-Thu04Jan2001235404+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il...
> > From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com>
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> > Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:12:15 -0500
> >
> > > And it's easy to avoid offensive words, too.
> >
> > Anyway, the only offensive word that was there was with respect to
myself
> > (see subject line :).
>
> No, it was something else, because all the messages except the
> original one did make it to the mailing list. The message I'm
> replying to also got reflected to the mailing list.
>
> So it is not the subject (and no, ``stupid'' is not an offensive word,
> as far as DJ's anti-spam filter is concerned).
- Raw text -