Date:	Wed, 3 Jan 2001 10:58:01 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Shawn Harrison <zils AT fuse DOT net>, crazyfingers AT fuse DOT net,
	harrisso AT email DOT uc DOT edu, shou2 AT juno DOT com
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: How does OR Will gcc produce assembler output in intel syntax with the new GAS ".intel_syntax" directive
In-Reply-To:	<t54bcplejk89f1@corp.supernews.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010103105736.1129P-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Shawn Harrison wrote:

> ( gcc -S ) produces AT&T syntax assembler output.
> How does or will gcc produce assembler output in intel syntax with the new
> GAS ".intel_syntax" directive

I don't think GCC can do that.

Why do you need this?  If it's to look at the produced code in syntax
you are used to, you can use the objdump utility on the .o file
produced by a normal compilation.

- Raw text -