From:	dontmailme AT iname DOT com (Steamer)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP Developement
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:57:13 GMT
Organization:	always disorganized
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<3a4b7e0c.9427917@news.freeserve.net>
References:	<PAw26.163808$_5 DOT 36727858 AT news4 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-181.bar-goby.dialup.pol.co.uk
X-Trace:	news7.svr.pol.co.uk 978026233 20435 62.136.228.181 (28 Dec 2000 17:57:13 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	28 Dec 2000 17:57:13 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Krull wrote:

> I've been using DJGPP forever, and I can't remember the last time I
> downloaded a new version.

Earlier this year, I should think.  Unless you're still using an
old version.

> I found that it still uses <limits.h> instead of
> the more modern <limits>.

C and C++ both require <limits.h>.  C++ also requires <limits>, but
this is a GCC issue, not a DJGPP issue.  The GCC web site says that
GCC 3.0 should be out by the end of the first quarter of 2001.
But a few days ago it was saying "end of 2000" - so don't put too
much faith in their planned release dates.

- Raw text -