Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2000 08:23:20 -0700
From:	Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DJGPP for Idiots
Message-ID:	<20001106082320.B14594@taniwha.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References:	<slrn8vuruf DOT 3vvmckn DOT dchapman AT CS670402-A DOT gvcl1 DOT bc DOT wave DOT home DOT com> <973053863 DOT 524673 AT shelley DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz> <39FFAA69 DOT 6CDA1D44 AT usq DOT edu DOT au> <8u48hg$j7r$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001106002426 DOT 02fb77d0 AT mail DOT subdimension DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To:	<5.0.0.25.0.20001106002426.02fb77d0@mail.subdimension.com>; from matt.l@techie.com on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:26:39AM -0800
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:26:39AM -0800, Matt Lewandowsky wrote:
> So, what of X Windows? Or is it just that "Windows" was tacked on to X? Or 
> OpenWindows? Just idle notes that the law is royally not right. (Skewed in 
> favor of the Goliaths rather than the Davids...)

It's not actually X Windows. The proper name is The X Window System (not
certain about the "The":). Microsoft can't touch `them' for two resons:
dissimilar enough (it's the X that's significant, not the windows) and X came
first anyway, I believe. (NOTE: IANAL)

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

- Raw text -