delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/09/05/23:00:05.1

Path: news.mv.net!news.shore.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!paloalto-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Damian Yerrick" <snews AT pineight DOT 8m DOT comMUNIST-PIGS-AOL>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <s2ik5.11438$gW5 DOT 735021 AT bgtnsc04-news DOT ops DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <srh3ps8f0jc69k4tq5emivk7qe94vf6g1c AT 4ax DOT com> <8n65c7$708 AT nntp DOT seflin DOT org> <njedpssuifm20prj5eg71kpo329s3cir94 AT 4ax DOT com> <39B4FA72 DOT 4943D810 AT inXSformatics DOT net>
Subject: Re: Borland 4.5 C/C++ compiler problem
Lines: 17
Organization: Pin Eight Software <http://pineight.8m.com/>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <QPht5.2822$zc6.364333@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net>
X-Trace: /w3Za9VKE/Y/CeLVNLlbBBGbYgRv1mVi3tWue5KcQ6HLvxxizjbyJHlx004nxep5lL2/LIIncCyk!q2MwRYlluvjycC3lBm+0gUWi9v8fALOk0PEOzS2zEHSvtTh0k/nhCiPNJHW8K7Mf2oFm+U1oVryE!LrcKlzOw
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 02:18:24 GMT
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 02:18:25 GMT
Xref: news.mv.net comp.os.msdos.programmer:110146 comp.os.msdos.djgpp:103191

"JohnT" <jrt AT inXSformatics DOT net> wrote:
>
> I was browsing around comp.os.msdos.djgpp and found the problem
> of parts of the disk being marked "unmoveable". I'm not sure, but
> think this may be due to DOS sessions running under Windows and
> getting some kind of undocumented crap written to files or clusters
> by Windows. My system had two hard drives for a while, one used
> as backup, and I would get rid of the unmoveable clusters by doing
> a backup, reformat and copying all the files back. The exact flag
> that causes the "unmoveable" designation I don't know about, but
> documented file attributes don't have a bit that means "unmoveable".
> Anyone got a good guess on this?

"Hidden" files and "system" files are considered by defraggers to be
fixed in position so as not to break some programs' copy protection.


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019