From:	"Stefan Viljoen" <rylan AT intekom DOT co DOT za>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Watcom vs djgpp
Date:	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:47:29 +0200
Message-ID:	<LPBBIAFKANLGHPODEBLFOEDDCAAA.rylan@intekom.co.za>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nick DiToro <NDiToro AT ati DOT com> wrote in message
news:<5337D585DDD3D111996B0008C728F07DA42A4B AT pa00fsr01 DOT pa DOT atitech DOT com>...
> Hi,
>
> First off, thanks for the earlier support!
>
> I write diagnostics code at ATI (a graphics card company), and we use the
> Watcom 11.0a compiler to create DOS-extended dos4gw executables.  Watcom
is
> no longer supported, and we are using GNU tools for other aspects of the
> project I am working on.  I am thinking about recommending that we switch
to

> 4) I would like to learn more about DJGPP and the go 32 DOS extender.
DJ's
> web site has been a great resource.  Can anybody point me to any other
> resources (other than those listed on the web site)? (Books, magazine
> articles, etc.)

I have some examples on my programming page on how to integrate DJGPP &
NASM - NASM, which you can use, as Damian pointed out, to more easily port
the assembly code.

http://home.intekom.com/rylan/

Some of this code is as well commented and clear as I could make it - feel
free to mail for more precise explanations if you find it neccessary.

Regards,

Stefan
Stefan_Viljoen AT excite DOT com

- Raw text -