From:	Sean Proctor <sproctor AT ccs DOT neu DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: How about bracket matching???
Message-ID:	<0s4qlskmkbjd1pjegf7ljch6sg17uokirs@4ax.com>
References:	<cdnllsc8sgc1v2udb8o1uenc7gb0guu53n AT 4ax DOT com> <395B7DD6 DOT 32606 DOT 1972BA5 AT localhost>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	22
Date:	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:36:49 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	207.16.155.188
X-Complaints-To:	Abuse Role <abuse AT enter DOT net>, We Care <abuse AT newsread DOT com>
X-Trace:	monger.newsread.com 962401009 207.16.155.188 (Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:36:49 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:36:49 EDT
Organization:	ENTER.net (enter.net)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:48:22 +1000, Leon AT caresystems DOT com DOT au wrote:

<snip>
>> in my opinion if you have 10 nested loops, etc,
>> you need to break your program down a little in to
>> functions... =)
>> 
>> Sean
>
>that is not always an option - if you want to 
>write databases only - ok but if you into some 
>heavy dsp - at times it pays not to use 
>overhead of method calling (esp if it is not 
>common to any other classes/methods)
>Leon.

well, then macros or inlining... someone else mentioned non-C
languages.  point taken.  I remember writing in scheme and it's just
utter madness.  I think on average there was a () pair to every
identifier...

Sean

- Raw text -