Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/06/29/07:33:40
I clearly disagree with THIS thread being off topic.
Subj directly relates to issues in DJGPP/ALLEGRO,
and relate DIRECTLY to segfaults related to the statements
below. Since the INTERNAL mechanics of Allegro and
DJGPP are at work when these PARTICULAR statements
are utilized... the subj warrants valid consideration.
Period. (read my closing statements below)
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:10:58 GMT, Sean Proctor <sproctor AT ccs DOT neu DOT edu>
wrote:
>On 28 Jun 2000 21:09:51 GMT, Sinan_Unur AT mail DOT com (A. Sinan Unur)
>wrote:
>
>>radsmail AT juno DOT com (Radical NetSurfer) wrote in
>><7qmkls0k46jupmhklc5sqesf999hn7vmjl AT 4ax DOT com>:
>>
>>>They most certainly ARE on topic, as I'm having SegFaults
>>>specific to DJ _and_ allegro, BITMAP* is an Allegro object,
>>>as it Pallete.... thus the relevancy.
[*SNIP*]
>>however, i do realize that i am continuing this trivial argument at DJ's
>>expense, so i'll shut up regarding this issue.
[*SNIP*]
>oh look... they're the same... huh... imagine the irony... one type...
>and a pointer to a different type... *and they're the same thing*!!!
>Don't hate me, I'm just in a bad mood.
>
>Sean
>
>PS onto the original question... I don't think they're the same... I'd
>have to read the docs to be sure, but I think palette is an array of
>rgb pixels or however they're defined... while bitmap is a 2d array of
>pixels with bounds, etc included. and I do think that was on topic as
>it was related to allegro... not some random library unrelated to
>djgpp...
Gosh, it would of been nice to see you provide the proper
malloc-ed array of Palette's....
and! lets not forget! I've always said that I _do_ welcome Email
responces... so please do not be shy out there in DJGPP land
to email someone as long as THAT topic remains to what the
posted message is about... thanks!
radsmail AT juno DOT com
http://members.tripod.com/~RadSurfer/
- Raw text -