delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:06:09 +0200 (WET) |
From: | Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: ANNOUNCE: Binutils 2.10 released |
In-Reply-To: | <3955C1F4.F358BBA8@home.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.A41.4.05.10006261003530.60198-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Robin Johnson wrote: > > No. Files produced by earlier versions of Binutils will continue to work with the new > > version. > I mean for better performance... > We must be carefull here. For example if one will configure gcc itself using binutils-2.10 newly built gcc binaries will generate assembler file incompatible with binutils-2.9.1 and earlier. I don't know about other packages with similar problems though Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |