Message-ID:	<3952DB31.726CAD4F@pacbell.net>
From:	Wesel <nospam AT pacbell DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Make file wildcards
Lines:	68
Date:	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 20:36:17 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host:	63.197.122.98
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT pacbell DOT net
X-Trace:	news.pacbell.net 961731039 63.197.122.98 (Thu, 22 Jun 2000 20:30:39 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 20:30:39 PDT
Organization:	SBC Internet Services
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I'm sure this topic has gone around before, and I apologise for not
lurking long.  I have a question about the format of a makefile I was
hoping (praying?) that you might be able to help me with.

The makefile suggested by the good people at delorie.com went as
follows:
--------------------------------------------------------
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -O2
OBJECTS = main.o foo.o

main.exe : $(OBJECTS)
        $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) -o main.exe

%.o : %.c
        $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $<
--------------------------------------------------------

The rule that stated %.o : %.c was supposed to happen whenever a file
with the extension .c got modified.  Taking this knowledge to heart, I
proceeded to make a single source file test.cpp.  I built my makefile as
follows:

--------------------------------------------------------
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g
OBJECTS = test.o

main.exe : $(OBJECTS)
	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) -o main.exe

%.o : %.c %.cpp %.h
	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $<
--------------------------------------------------------

My hopes were that upon discovering a modified .cpp file, make would
compile test.o then, finding a modified (created) test.o file, it would
build main.exe from the object file.  The makefile compiled fine, but it
used a sneaky implicit rule.  Apparantly %.o : %.cpp is built-in, so
what I saw was

--------------------------------------------------------
make -k
gpp    -c -o test.o test.cpp
gcc -g test.o -o main.exe

Compilation finished at Thu Jun 22 20:29:34
--------------------------------------------------------

One might notice that the implicit rule generates NO debug information
for test.o.  When I ran gdb on main.exe, it found no information about
line numbers, and couldn't show me the related source code.  Upon
disabling implicit rules, make returned with an error stating that a
rule for test.o was missing.

Why didn't "%.o : %.c %.cpp %.h" generate a rule for compiling test.o? 
Is there any way I can use wildcards with the make utility provided by
djgpp?  Do I have to write out every rule for every object-source pair I
use?  I do intend to have more than one source file eventually.

Thank you kindly.


Wesel

-- 
To send me an email, just replace the @ and the .
     -----wassdamo at pacbell dot net

- Raw text -