Date:	Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:00:34 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	GAMMELJL AT SLU DOT EDU
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: genprec and gmp
In-Reply-To:	<01JQTYWSFSX49JQ1FC@SLU.EDU>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000621100017.11317B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 GAMMELJL AT SLU DOT EDU wrote:

>      A factor 2 is quite valuable.  I would like to see gmp
> rewritten in C++, complex numbers introduced, and the elementary
> transcendental functions included in the package.

Just a random thought: it is not unheard of to have a program
rewritten in C++ suffer a twofold slow-down.  Perhaps this is the main
reason your implementation is so much slower.

- Raw text -