Date:	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:15:01 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: dos color ?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0006151354020.15819-100000@roadrunner.grendel.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000615151353.13268B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Prashant TR wrote:
> 
> > IMHO, this is *not* a good idea. This is ideal for real mode
> > programs. You can never be sure that the "INT 10" will be passed to
> > real mode. Some extenders support it, some don't. The best way to do
> 
> AFAIK aren't int 10h and  21h (among certain others) guaranteed to be
> passed on to  the real mode handler...

They are.  As a matter of fact, *all* interrupts are passed, except that 
functions that accept pointers to buffers will not work.

- Raw text -