From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <see_below AT the_messasge_body DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: far pointers
Date:	Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:21:02 +0400
Organization:	None
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<39450DEE.931CADE3@the_messasge_body.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000612153502 DOT 5082G-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp101-53.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 960827033 21469 212.188.101.53 (12 Jun 2000 16:23:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	12 Jun 2000 16:23:53 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
[snip]
> > > Compare this with CWSDPMI that runs on top of HIMEM.SYS.  You do not have
> > > V86 there, but HIMEM is still used to switch into PM.
> >
> > Btw, HIMEM.SYS uses BIOS Int 15h fn 87h for data copying.
> 
> I wasn't talking about data copying, I was talking about switching
> into PM, in order to run protected-mode code.

I was pointing out that HIMEM can still work even if CPU is in V86. Just
because it uses BIOS services which could be emulated by either EMM386 or
Windows or something else.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
E-mail:   alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -