From:	Niklas_Pson AT nosmam DOT hotmail DOT com (Niklas Pettersson)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Strange behaviour of new/delete
Date:	7 Jun 2000 11:54:57 GMT
Organization:	Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden
Lines:	11
Message-ID:	<8F4C86B4FNiklasPsonnospamhotm@130.235.20.4>
References:	<8hknqj$gki$1 AT mulga DOT cs DOT mu DOT OZ DOT AU> <393DF410 DOT 93824118 AT earthlink DOT net> <8hkthr$kda$1 AT mulga DOT cs DOT mu DOT OZ DOT AU>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	npedt97.univ.vxu.se
User-Agent:	Xnews/03.04.11
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

operator new throws a exception on failure (bad_alloc). You can catch this
with a catch statement or just let it pass (in that case the program will 
call abort automagical). The chance that new will fail is however very 
small since the harddrive can be used to simulate a very large virtual 
memory.. Just of couriousity, why do you use double** in this way? Is it an 
imlementation of a matrix or something?


/ Pson

- Raw text -