Date:	Sun, 4 Jun 2000 09:04:30 +0600 (LKT)
From:	Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
X-Sender:	kalum AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Internal compiler error
In-Reply-To:	<200006031824.VAA28417@mailgw1.netvision.net.il>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0006040903010.760-100000@roadrunner.grendel.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 06:02:22 +0600 (LKT)
> > From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
> >
> > > and gcc produces very good code.
> > 
> > But is isn't as good as M$ C IIRC......
> 
> Not anymore.  See SET's page for details.

Thanks..but by the way it would be good to keep in perspective that the
Watcom 10.x series were released in 1994/5, over 5-6 years old while the
gcc's used for the test were pretty recent releases..

Grendel 

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

- Raw text -