From:	Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: netbd.h, sockets.h, in.h and types.h don't work
Date:	Thu, 01 Jun 2000 22:49:22 +0100
Organization:	Customer of Planet Online
Lines:	24
Message-ID:	<3936DA62.9581F9CE@bigfoot.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000601085256 DOT 17554C AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-108.amantadine.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 959896690 30215 62.136.77.108 (1 Jun 2000 21:58:10 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	1 Jun 2000 21:58:10 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On 31 May 2000, Chris Lee wrote:
> >
> > Dude we're NOT talking about Microsoft-style intergration here.....
> 
> Sorry, I cannot parse this.  Don't you agree that the development
> environment will become larger?  And what's Microsoft got to do with
> this?

I think we need to define the term "integration" here. AFAICT Eli and me
think that you mean integration into djdev itself, whereas you are
thinking about integration between two separate entities: djdev + library.
The puzzling thing is that the second case is what we have today anyway -
most of the network libraries do integrate with DJGPP, otherwise how would
they work?

Bye,

-- 
Richard Dawe
richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/

- Raw text -