Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/05/06/07:45:34

From: Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: structures size
Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 11:29:46 +0100
Organization: Customer of Planet Online
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <>
References: <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10005041827250 DOT 48816-100000 AT ieva05 DOT lanet DOT lv> <3911D576 DOT 947D53CF AT mtu-net DOT ru> <3913074E DOT 9405129F AT bigfoot DOT com> <39133B43 DOT 5BC03E9 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: 957612264 10069 (6 May 2000 11:24:24 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 May 2000 11:24:24 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


"Alexei A. Frounze" wrote:
> Richard Dawe wrote:
> > Is it better because you can nest packing pragmas this way?
> Yup. This was the idea I have in mind. Seems to be a bit better. Right?

I prefer "__attribute__((packed))" myself on the actual structure, but
nestable packing pragmas seem like a good idea if you're using them in
header files. Is this push/pop a gcc extension?


Richard Dawe
richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019