delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/04/18/03:59:15

From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:31:15 +0400
Organization: MTU-Intel ISP
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <38FC0F43.87E209B3@mtu-net.ru>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004180455310 DOT 1540-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <38FBB719 DOT 3915C530 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <8dgvat DOT 3vvqu6v DOT 0 AT buerssner-17104 DOT user DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp101-157.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 956043538 86544 212.188.101.157 (18 Apr 2000 07:38:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Apr 2000 07:38:58 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,ru
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dieter Buerssner wrote:
> >Yes, we have proved. We also haven't trow away all my inline ASM. The
> >FIDIVRL trick is still alive. :)
> 
> Wrong. 

It's not wrong, since I don't get your results with (USEC=USEC2=1 and -O
switch). I get it *slower*. And I have no idea what's up.

> Put the source I sent you on your homepage, so everybody still
> interested can judge. I stand by my claim, that I have disabled
> *all* your inline assembly in T_Map(), and got the same FPS.

I'll put it.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019