From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: THE BET
Date:	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:15:42 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	24
Message-ID:	<38FBB73E.4AFA584A@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004180513400 DOT 1540-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp97-207.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 956020510 31802 212.188.97.207 (18 Apr 2000 01:15:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	18 Apr 2000 01:15:10 GMT
Cc:	buers AT gmx DOT de, kalum AT lintux DOT cx
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:
> 
> Well it was Dieter....:-) Did you read his post.....His C code got >70
> FPS...
> 
> Grendel
> 
> Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
> :)

I forgot about one important thing. W/o FIDIVRL executed in parallel to the
span() function he wouldn't get such a result. This trick is unchanged by him.
:)

With FIDIVRL trick FPS is 45...70, w/o 36...52. 
Check this yourself or ask Dieter. :)

The rest C is almost the same as my inline ASM.

Well, I still thik I won the bet (because of the FIDIVRL trick which is located
in my inline ASM :), although we have proved that GCC _is_ efficient.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze

- Raw text -