Date:	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:29:47 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Jacek Pichla <jacekp AT bxsoft DOT rzeszow DOT pl>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Odp: CWSDPMI r5
In-Reply-To:	<C6BK4.8802$hK2.152232@news.tpnet.pl>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000417132909.16343E-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Jacek Pichla wrote:

> Same as  with  GCC 2.96,  I guess :)

No, the FAQ doesn't refer to GCC 2.96, it refers to 2.95.2, which is 
correct ;-).

- Raw text -