From:	"OiSyN" <mailme AT oisyn DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: alternative malloc
Date:	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:49:05 +0200
Message-ID:	<955914263.15211.0.pluto.d4ee0fa5@news.demon.nl>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000416105208 DOT 2482l-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	x-project.demon.nl
X-NNTP-Posting-Host:	x-project.demon.nl:212.238.15.165
X-Trace:	news.demon.nl 955914263 pluto:15211 NO-IDENT x-project.demon.nl:212.238.15.165
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT nl DOT demon DOT net
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Lines:	14
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> If your program has replacements for malloc, free, and realloc, then
> the linker will use them instead of the versions in the library.
>
> But you *must* implement all the 3 functions, since the library
> version has them all on a single module.

Ah... I only wrote a malloc and a free, but it didn't work... Thanx!

OiSyN
mailme AT oisyn DOT com

- Raw text -