From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	[Fwd: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem]
Date:	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 13:33:11 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<38F988D7.8752D89C@mtu-net.ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp97-187.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 955887122 21507 212.188.97.187 (16 Apr 2000 12:12:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	16 Apr 2000 12:12:02 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:21:03 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>


On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> By *official* I mean correct/valid description of inline asm. I.e. one that
> doesn't make you to correct my inline asm as you were doing all the time. :)

I don't think anybody will be able to guarantee absolutely correct 
documentation.  The docs and tutorials cited in the FAQ are the best we 
know of.  If they have errors, please submit patches.  If you find better 
docs, please post their URLs, and I will add them to the FAQ.

A URL of one other good tutorial was posted a few weeks ago to the news 
group.  You could look it up by searching the archives at 
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/.

In general, inline assembly is notoriously underdocumented.  So it's no 
wonder you will have to learn a lot as you go.

- Raw text -