From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: THE -O2 PROBLEM - PART II
Date:	Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:16:41 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	31
Message-ID:	<38F82569.817316A6@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<38F20E7A DOT 3330E9A4 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F6C64E DOT C7753C6C AT mtu-net DOT ru> <8d7l3g$j3i$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <38F76B94 DOT 5E968BA7 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F7A6FE DOT ED9B3E59 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F82ABA DOT FEBEB2B0 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp97-7.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 955786835 15072 212.188.97.7 (15 Apr 2000 08:20:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	15 Apr 2000 08:20:35 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

it eliminates C code but not inline asembly.

For example:

if (KeyMap[sTab]) {		// key is pressed
  do_something();
  while (KeyMap[sTab]) {};	// this line is replaced with infinite loop
}

But I need that line AS-IS.

thanks.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> "Alexei A. Frounze" wrote:
> >
> > But with optimizations enabled, I simply get faulty code, since compiler
> > eliminates checking of the array. How to prevent this from optimizations?
> 
> If the compiler eliminates the entire inline asm block, one way to prevent it
> is with "__asm__ __volatile__" instead of just "__asm__" or "asm".
> 
> If that's not the problem, I suggest to post the offending code fragment and
> its surroundings.

- Raw text -