delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem |
Date: | Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:10:31 +0400 |
Organization: | MTU-Intel ISP |
Lines: | 18 |
Message-ID: | <38F637C7.4F4ECB6@mtu-net.ru> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000413112851 DOT 28180G-100000 AT is> <38F6137B DOT 47481761 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38f6342c DOT 52524603 AT news DOT freeserve DOT net> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | ppp103-131.dialup.mtu-net.ru |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | gavrilo.mtu.ru 955660583 71604 212.188.103.131 (13 Apr 2000 21:16:23 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 13 Apr 2000 21:16:23 GMT |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) |
X-Accept-Language: | en,ru |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Steamer wrote: > The bugs in your code are in the interface between the C and the inline > assembly. They may not cause a problem if you don't use -O2, but they > surely will as soon as the optimizer starts trying to rearrange things, > remove redundant instructions, avoid unnecessary memory access, etc. Thus design of the optimizer is buggy as well. :)) Remember, someone pointed out that AS doesn't recognize extra parentheses? So, this is also a problem of interface between GCC and AS. bye. Alexei A. Frounze ----------------------------------------- Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |