From:	nobody AT nowhere
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Rhide vs. emacs/gdb
Date:	Sun, 02 Apr 2000 01:26:37 GMT
Organization:	Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<sed5736j948@corp.supernews.com>
X-Complaints-To:	newsabuse AT supernews DOT com
X-Newsreader:	News Xpress 2.01
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,
        Now that I'm in win95 DOS boxes rather than in pure DOS, Rhide 1.4 
crashes during debugging.  Sigh, I loved Rhide.  Tried calling gdb from 
Rhide's tool menu, but get a "-d parameter not understood" error.

        So, on to emacs.  Two problems:
        1) It won't spawn a shell from the Win95 DOS box. (I was going to 
compile/debug from a shell).
        2) DJGPP can't link an .exe file together if GDB is open on that file. 
 So I have to close gdb (and lose any breakpoints I have set), compile, start 
gdb again, etc..


        I was hoping to use emacs as a pseudo IDE, maybe with the help of 
multiple DOS boxes if necessary.  How do you veteran Unix-heads work 
efficiently, what kind of environments do you set up?  Or should I just go to 
Borland?

- Raw text -