X-Originating-Host:	202.158.46.2
Organization:	http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
Subject:	Re: VBE question
Lines:	14
From:	batchex <thedark1NOthSPAM AT phreaker DOT net DOT invalid>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Message-ID:	<05d34b2c.fc4eeff7@usw-ex0105-036.remarq.com>
References:	<054a4830 DOT 80e90c42 AT usw-ex0105-036 DOT remarq DOT com> <200003300638 DOT LAA00861 AT midpec DOT com>
Bytes:	524
X-Wren-Trace:	eLOWvr+m4avg56++svKgsfCAs76ksvKus63yvr+z6qHs573j6Kvo6en85Q==
Date:	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:06:59 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host:	10.0.2.36
X-Complaints-To:	wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com
X-Trace:	WReNphoon4 954446819 10.0.2.36 (Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:06:59 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:06:59 PST
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <200003300638 DOT LAA00861 AT midpec DOT com>,
prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com (Prashant TR) wrote:
>
>Why don't you try __djgpp_map_physical_memory? It's much easier
than using
>DPMI functions, IMHO.
>
Yes it is. But IMHO, __djgpp_map_physical_memory is doing the
similar thing as the DPMI function. My question is, how to use
the address returned by those functions.


* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

- Raw text -