delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/03/30/12:12:54

Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:28:54 +0600 (LKT)
From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
X-Sender: root AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [WANTED]Old GCC/GXX's
In-Reply-To: <8buv3g$5jg$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003301825380.1197-100000@darkstar.grendel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 30 Mar 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> DJ Delorie (dj AT delorie DOT com) wrote:
> 
> : > My original reaction to this topic was that it would be worthwhile to
> : > return the gcc 2.7.2.1 zips to the DJGPP archive, for reasons that have
> : > arisen in this thread (stability, small size, etc).  Others disagree,
> : > however; probably they all have much newer machines than I do :-/
> 
> : Given that the DJGPP archives are (1) large, and (2) hosted by a third
> : party, I'd rather not keep old versions of things around once the new
> : versions are basically usable.
> 
> Isn't it time to remove v1* then?

No please don't do that. There still are programs which are V1 programs,
one such program is unzip386.exe .

Since there are still programs with sources written for V1, It doesn't
make sense to remove such a nice distribution....

Grendel 

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019