Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/03/12/12:37:45
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 09:30:27 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
wrote:
>
>On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Krogg wrote:
>
>> Well,It is alot easier for me to navigate html files
>
>Why is it easier? Info readers have the same commands for navigation
>as HTML browsers do.
My browser (IE) uses backspace instead of l for "go to last document."
And where's the "back" button? Not the back key, the on-screen back
button? I'd like to see a GTK+ Info reader that looks like Netscape
(now that the GIMP is ported, it could use WinGTK+).
>Info readers have much better facilities for quickliy finding the
>required information. For example, the index-search command and the
>automatic completion of index items and section names. You lose all
>this if you use the HTML version of the docs.
But you gain the mouse and multiple windows. And you gain support for
copying to the Windows clipboard. (No wait, those are in InfView and
tkInfo.
And you gain antialiased proportional fonts. (No wait, that's in
tkInfo.)
>> and I just cant stand info....
>
>There are better Info browsers than the stand-alone info.exe which
>comes with Texinfo. The FAQ mentions the other readers in section
>5.1.
What I'd like to see is Info support rolled into the next Mozilla.
--
Damian Yerrick http://yerricde.tripod.com/
Comment on story ideas: http://home1.gte.net/frodo/quickjot.html
AOL is sucks! Find out why: http://anti-aol.org/faqs/aas/
View full sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html
This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your .sig to
prevent the spread of .sig viruses. http://www.mcafee.com/
- Raw text -